Dr Paulina Taboada
Profesor Centro de Bioetica
Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile
Alameda 340 Correo Central 1
Santiago, Chile
The Journal of Clinical Ethics, 2001; 12, (3) is devoted to a special issue: Neonatal Ethics. Among the many interesting articles contained in the volume, there is one by Franck & Lefrack devoted to “The Ethical Treatment of Infant’s Pain" (pages 275-281).
Among the historical reasons why neonatal pain management has been neglected for decades, the authors mention facts like the special difficulties for an accurate pain evaluation in newborns; particular attitudinal barriers both on the side of care givers and parents; the conception of infants as not yet “full” human persons; etc.
Two clinical cases are presented to illustrate the influence of ethical considerations on the clinical treatment of pain in infants. One is a case of pain release for circumcision and the other post-operative pain management after major cardiac surgery. The authors show how inadequate decisions about pain-management frequently rest on attitudinal, ethical and/or moral barriers that scientific evidence alone cannot change.
Referring to the ‘Ethical Obligations’ pointed out in the ‘Core Curriculum for Professional Education in Pain’ by the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP Press, Seattle, 1995), the authors discuss some ethical principles that are central to pain management, such as non-malfeasance, beneficence, autonomy, justice, fidelity and veracity. Hence, the beneficial effects of pain-release (principle of beneficence) have to be weighed against the harms of unrelieved neonatal pain as well as against the potential harms of the treatment (principle of non-malfeasance). The principle of justice demands that newborns get the same right to pain-management as adults.
In my opinion, the main contribution of the article is that it shows in an concrete way that in order “to promote a greater cohesion between the practice of pain management and ethics of neonatal care, we need to understand and appreciate the ethical principles that underpin the clinical management of neonatal pain” (p. 276). I see no reasons why this reflection would not apply to other fields of medical care especially to Palliative Care.
Dr. Paulina Taboada, MD, PhD
Palliative Care and Bioethics
This Holiday Season
Help us to help others: IAHPC's annual fundraiser!
How your gift supports the IAHPC mission
Achieved: $24,941
Goal: $30,000
83%
Education
Your gift funds the operational costs of our online courses taught by globally recognized experts who volunteer their time and provide educational resources relevant to palliative care topics. It also supports scholarships that enable palliative care workers to attend educational events and congresses, and allows us to maintain Pallipedia, the free, live, online dictionary.
The goal of this pillar is to implement strategies, resources and tools that will improve the competencies of the global workforce for appropriate palliative care delivery. We have two programs under this pillar plus many other resources for our members.
Your gift enables us to build and strengthen the partnerships that accelerate global, regional, and national advocacy for palliative care. We advocate for its integration into primary health care under universal health coverage and effective access to essential palliative care medicines and packages for people of all ages. Your gift supports our work to prepare delegates and participate in technical consultation meetings of the relevant UN organizations.
The goal this pillar is the integration of palliative care into primary health care within the spectrum of universal coverage to improve access to adequate care for patients in need. We offer the following to our members:
Documents on Human Rights and Access to Medicines and Care
Research
Your gift enables us to continue doing research that provides guidance and recommendations for action, based on responses from the global palliative care community. Such research includes our recent evaluation of the impact of euthanasia and assisted dying practices on palliative care workers and the use of essential medicines for palliative care. It also supports the costs of publications focused on research relevant to palliative care.
The goal of this pillar is to design and implement projects that lead to the integration of palliative care into health policies, resolutions, and key documents. Our studies help us provide guidance and recommendations, and take action based on the responses from the global palliative care community.
Your membership enables you to participate in IAHPC projects such as the:
Your gift enables us to continue our in-depth reporting and book reviews in Pallinews, as well as media campaigns that raise awareness about the need to increase access to care and support for patients and families.
We are a small organization that allocates over 80% of our budget to mission driven programs and to the maintenance of our free website. We need operational funding to continue the work.
Give a gift, get a gift
IAHPC members: When you gift a 2-year membership to a colleague in a low- or middle-income country, we extend your membership by 6 months.